 |
 |
 |
 |
Alan
Bodnar, Ph.D. is the Co-Director of Psychology Training at Westborough
State Hospital, Mass. and a consultant in the field of leadership
development. |
 |
|
 |
|
By Alan Bodnar, Ph.D.
For weeks, the newcomer to the group sat in silence. Slouching
in his chair with his backward baseball cap and heavy-lidded eyes,
he gave the impression of being asleep. His muscular frame and impassive
expression kept us from testing the sleep hypothesis with the kind
of question we would have asked a more approachable member. Then,
one day, after weeks of silence, the fellow exploded - not with
the rage that we probably feared - but in a heartfelt plea to be
understood for the person he is beyond his psychiatric diagnosis.
Remember "The Merchant of Venice" and Shylock's demand to be recognized
and respected for his essential humanity rather than scorned out
of fear and prejudice against his station in life? Remember that
bit of Shakespeare and you will have a fair picture of what took
place in the group therapy room - with one important exception.
Shylock's mistreatment had fueled his hunger for revenge and he
declared in no uncertain terms that he intended to take it. Our
young man was just as clearly renouncing violence and asking for
our help to keep his resolution.
As this man told the story of his life and the way his challenging
circumstances were complicated further by the emergence of a mental
illness in his teens, he balanced the failures so well chronicled
in his medical record with reminders of his equally impressive successes.
He took offense when he heard another patient's behavior labeled
as "strange" by hospital staff and asked how anything marked with
the dignity due to the human person could be so callously noted
and dismissed. He told us about a child in his neighborhood with
a severe developmental disorder that in his estimation would make
him and his fellow patients appear to be exemplars of mental health.
When he described his neighbor, he gave us a picture of a little
boy, so radically different from what most of us consider normal
but no less a complex person with likes and dislikes and the capacity
to respond to the attention of others.
The young man knew these things about the boy because he clearly
took the time to look beyond the obvious to the hidden strengths
that people so often missed. The young man in our group told us
nothing about acknowledging the strengths of our patients that we
hadn't already encountered scores of times in formal lectures, the
scientific literature and in our daily experience as therapists.
Maybe it wasn't so much the message that impressed us as it was
the messenger, the timing and the manner of its delivery.
Sometimes it is not the therapist but the patient who has to be
reminded and convinced of her strengths. A young woman who has been
hospitalized a few times is now learning to integrate various aspects
of herself into an image that is positive, hopeful and realistic.
She understands she has a mental illness but also knows how to identify
its symptoms and take action to minimize the chances that they will
interfere with the life she wants for herself. These days, her presentation
is markedly different from that of the apprehensive person so puzzled
and shamed by her illness that she would spend hour after hour describing
every aspect of her being that once radiated health - her brighter
smile, stronger voice, glowing complexion and easy manner that all
seemed to fade when mental illness struck.
All of the assurance that we felt capable of providing seemed to
do nothing to convey the message that she was a good and whole person
with a new challenge that she could learn to manage. Yet until she
could accept her basic dignity, she was unable to acknowledge and
begin to address the problems that brought her to the hospital.
Elementary geometry teaches us that the shortest distance between
two points is a straight line and, in our work as therapists, we
are sometimes tempted to find and travel that line from problem
to cure. Eventually, we learn the limitations of the geometrical
paradigm and look for another way of understanding what we do. In
this quest, we may do well to emulate that new breed of philosophers,
architects and urban specialists who style themselves "psychogeographers"
in their attempt to reclaim the neglected spaces between traditional
points of departure and arrival.
If I were a psychogeographer traveling from my home in a Boston
suburb to visit a friend in London, I would walk to and from both
airports and let myself be drawn in by the landscape and architecture
of the neighborhoods I crossed. My journey would be shaped by a
sense of drift as well as purpose and I would arrive with a better
understanding of myself, my friend and the world that we both share.
This is hardly a practical way to travel, but it does provide the
traveler with a thorough knowledge of the terrain. This is the terrain
that our patients invite us to notice, the journey that they ask
us to share. In their shoes, wouldn't we do the same?
|