New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingAbout Us

Special Education law could get update
(October 2003 Issue)

By Elizabeth Millard

The way special education programs operate could significantly change should a bipartisan bill meet with approval by the House and President George W. Bush.

In June, the Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee passed legislation that updates the nation's special education law. The legislation, put together by Senators Edward M. Kennedy (D- Mass.) and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), re-authorizes the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1975 (IDEA). Under the bill, school districts could see less paperwork for special education teachers and have improved conflict resolution and mediation, as well as reduced litigation. The legislation aims to improve disciplinary action, an issue that has prompted conflict in the past from both special education advocates and school districts.

"This reauthorization is designed to ensure that special education resources are directed to help children with disabilities obtain the same opportunity to succeed as all other students," Gregg says. "I'm confident that we are meeting that goal with [this] bill."

The updated legislation includes many changes to the original IDEA, especially in the area of discipline. It mandates that parents and schools address concerns with the use of alternative dispute resolution, and have access to mediation resources at any time.

The bill also requires that schools consider whether a child's behavior is the result of his/her disability when considering disciplinary action.

For those children who are disciplined, a school would have to do a behavioral assessment and then provide appropriate preventative treatment. Gregg says, "It improves discipline by simplifying the procedures used by school districts and improves parental involvement in the education process."

When the special education law was last rewritten in 1997, there was debate in Congress over the issue of how to regulate schools' authority in the area of discipline. The bill's supporters hope that with this bipartisan compromise, those tussles can be avoided.

The bill also includes ways to reduce the misidentification of non-disabled children by allowing for development of new approaches to determine whether students have specific learning disabilities. Funds would be included in the legislation for this area in order to hire specialists who could suggest effective strategies for prevention of misidentification.

Areas of the bill needing clarification included finance and funding. When IDEA was originally passed, the federal government was supposed to pay 40 percent of the cost of special education, but that amount has decreased to about 18 percent. In small rural states like New Hampshire, the costs of making up the difference can present a burden to school districts. The new bill would prevent slowly dwindling federal money by simplifying grant funding and mandating that it be predictable in future years.

If approved, the bill would govern the program for the next five years. However, whether it will pass remains to be determined. According to Joshua Shields, a spokesperson in Gregg's office, the legislation is currently in the Senate, awaiting full approval there. "Any difference between the bills must be ironed out," Shields says. "Then it must be signed by the President before it goes into effect. It's hard to say how quickly all that will happen."